The Lowdown Hub

Billionaire James Dyson Plans $3.6 Billion Move Into Batteries And Robotics After Electric Car

Billionaire inventor Sir James Dyson has put his 2020 troubles behind him with the announcement of a $3.6 billion war chest to develop technology that will take Dyson products outside of the home for the very first time.

The British industrial designer best-known for his distinctive and much-loved household appliances–vacuum cleaners, hand dryers, and hair straighteners–also confirmed long-standing plans to move his global head office from the U.K. to Singapore.

The most likely move for Dyson is further development of the powerful, long-life batteries, intended for its much-hyped but abandoned electric vehicle project that the billionaire was forced to shelve in October last year. Although specifics are yet to be confirmed, Dyson said in a statement today that it will “double” its portfolio of products and enter entirely new fields of innovation including robotics and machine learning by 2025.

The Importance Of Queer Student Resources On A Collegiate Level

Grads of Life BRANDVOICE | Paid Program

Teaching Entrepreneurship Will Be Key To The Post-COVID Recovery


Fighting COVID-19 In Venezuela With Soap And Water And Expertise

DEU Technik Dyson Ventilator

Sir James Dyson with a fan APN

Electric Pivot

Everything propelling.

The announcement of a $3.6 billion “drive” for new technology products comes after a number of public setbacks for one of Britain’s best-known billionaire entrepreneurs.

While October 2019 saw the end of their dream to build a Dyson electric car, in 2020 he received a very public rejection from the U.K. government to build much-needed hospital ventilators during the height of the covid-19 pandemic in April.


Billionaire Philip Green Continues To Fight As His Arcadia Retail Empire Denies Reports Of Imminent Collapse

The Two Billion-Dollar Mystery Behind The Ownership Of London-listed Kazakh Fintech Kaspi

No, Elon Musk Is Not The Second Richest Person In The World -- Here's Why

However, not all was lo